Judge rejects CRA’s expense denial in sweet music to taxpayer’s ears

Article content material

Many mother and father encourage their children to pursue their ardour, particularly in the event that they present expertise at a younger age in the direction of a specific endeavour, however different mother and father might go approach past mere encouragement and dig deep into their very own pockets to financially help a baby as they launch their profession.

This begs a query: Can a mum or dad’s bills to assist their baby’s profession ever be tax deductible? A current tax case handled exactly this difficulty.

Article content material

Article content material

The case concerned a taxpayer who has a “musically proficient daughter.” The taxpayer selected to make use of each his enterprise administration and contract negotiation abilities to assist handle his daughter’s inventive profession. The 2 of them entered a “private administration contract” wherein the daddy would initially incur varied bills in return for receiving a fee if his daughter ended up signing with a serious file label.

In 2017, the taxpayer claimed $52,046 in “enterprise bills” referring to managing his daughter’s profession. The Canada Revenue Agency, nevertheless, wasn’t satisfied the taxpayer was really within the enterprise of artist administration, so it disallowed his expense deductions. The taxpayer appealed the matter to the Tax Court docket, which launched its choice earlier this month.

By the use of background, the taxpayer started working in gross sales after highschool and was employed for a number of years as an account supervisor at a world cash switch firm. That job led to a senior alternative with a cheque-cashing agency that, on the time, had three retail areas. He turned a shareholder and director of the enterprise, and helped it develop till it was bought to a publicly traded U.S. firm. He has been with that firm for 22 years, and is presently the vice-president of actual property, a task that requires him to barter contracts and leases, in addition to do all the corporate’s website choice. He described himself in courtroom as “an entrepreneur at coronary heart.”

Article content material

Article content material

The taxpayer’s daughter is a singer/songwriter. When she was first beginning out, one of many judges at a expertise present let her know that he wish to work together with her. The taxpayer negotiated a contract with this decide, which led to his daughter recording an unreleased album that was produced by this particular person at an Ontario studio.

To facilitate the tax and enterprise aspect of issues, the taxpayer employed an accountant who was additionally a musician and had contacts within the music trade to help and advise him. With the accountant’s assist, the taxpayer ready a private administration contract that stated (amongst different issues) that he would obtain a five- or 10-per-cent fee if his daughter achieved a serious milestone, corresponding to signing with a serious file label, whereas underneath his administration. The settlement stated that if not one of the milestones have been met inside 5 years, she may terminate the contract.

In 2017, father and daughter started to work on establishing a community of trade contacts. That 12 months, he was launched to a Nashville producer, who launched them to different music individuals in that metropolis. The taxpayer testified that in late 2017, he and his daughter determined to remain in Nashville to work with the producer on a brand new album.

Article content material

Most of 2017 was spent recording music demos, negotiating the phrases and situations for producing the album, travelling to Nashville, capturing the album cowl and doing social media to extend his daughter’s profile. He described the method as “labour-intensive” and “nearly cost-prohibitive” at the start as a result of it took almost two years to supply and grasp the album.

They introduced the album again to Canada and shopped it round to “blended evaluations.” In 2019, they met a producer who owned a Toronto file label and signed an settlement that gave the corporate possession rights over his daughter’s music, together with the unique proper to distribute grasp recordings and to difficulty remixes of songs to revive curiosity in them. His daughter did obtain some royalties for one tune that was performed on the radio in 2016.

The problem earlier than the courtroom was whether or not the taxpayer had a “supply of revenue,” particularly, a real industrial enterprise. As in prior cases, the decide turned to a seminal Supreme Court docket of Canada choice that discovered the place to begin was to determine whether or not a taxpayer’s exercise was undertaken in “pursuit of revenue” or was private. The place there’s a private component, the exercise will need to have a adequate diploma of “commerciality” to be thought of a supply of revenue.

Article content material

In figuring out whether or not a taxpayer is carrying on an exercise in a sufficiently industrial method, the checklist of things to be thought of embody: revenue and loss skilled in previous years; the taxpayer’s coaching; the taxpayer’s supposed plan of action; and the aptitude of the exercise to indicate a revenue.

The decide reviewed the information of the case, noting there was clearly a private component concerned as a result of the artist being managed was the taxpayer’s daughter. Subsequently, the important thing query was whether or not the exercise was carried on in a sufficiently industrial method in order to be a supply of revenue.

The decide dominated it was, noting the taxpayer’s prior entrepreneurial success in rising a enterprise in addition to his deep expertise negotiating contracts. It appeared logical, due to this fact, that the taxpayer would enter a contractual association along with his daughter to make use of his talent set to assist advance her profession. The taxpayer additionally demonstrated his skilled intent by partaking an accountant with an understanding of the music trade.

Article content material

“Placing apart the unpredictability of the music trade by way of whether or not an artist achieves success, the radio play of (her) songs, royalties acquired, and the continued curiosity of music producers to work together with her exhibit that the exercise is able to displaying a revenue,” the decide stated. “The (taxpayer) carried on his exercise of artist administration in a sufficiently industrial method in order to be a supply of enterprise revenue.”

Because of this, the taxpayer’s enterprise bills for 2017 have been deemed to be correctly tax deductible.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

In case you appreciated this story, sign up for more within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it is advisable to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.

Article content material